Social Networks: Don’t Fear the Reaper

Blue Oyster Cult Don’t Fear the Reaper frames this post well.

Why I’m Opting out of Centralized Social Networks

As far as I can tell centralized social networks are redundant, and about as un-web like as you can get. The comparisons of Facebook and even Twitter to AOL are not unfounded. We yield far too much control to third party corporations by constraining how we communicate over the Net. We have blogs to capture and share our thoughts on diverse topics with varying complexity. There are numerous free blogging platforms, and free software for self hosted solutions. But this format is perceived as too heavy for short single messages, and thus microblogging emerged as a socially accepted pattern.

A URL can point to all social interactions, videos, songs, and Net data we desire. This URL doesn’t have to point to stream data that resides in a company database, behind a paywall (this includes blog platforms that don’t enable default, easy read/write access). The moment we make this Faustian bargain we hand over value and more importantly control to an external entity that may not share our best interests. Distributed solutions to social sharing these streams is growing at an exponential pace. This model does mimick features of the p2p content sharing system.

Microblogging is hot as a marketing engine and a quick browsing interface to longer form content. Twitter is the most popular social browser outside of Facebook but both of these type of networks are redundant once users become familiar with alternatives. Open options have failed to be competitive because of marketing, ease of use, and the requirement for new standards (or implementation of old ones). A general purpose browser can render URLs, which can correspond to people streams, object statuses, or whatever we can imagine at that URL. Social browsers need not be locked away in a corporate database or handed out piece meal with rigid or lacking formats. Corporate and open source tools compete to manage feed following and remixing/curation. You can count on the leading social browsing tool organizations to embrace the distributed nature of the web and Internet, where everyone and no one owns all the data. Financial models which support this format is where we have to push our creativity.

  • http://twitter.com/jimocz Jim Dwulit

    We'll miss you on the centralized social networks. Are you sure you want to opt-out?

  • http://arnoldwaldstein.com awaldstein

    Hi Mark

    ..love the song choice btw. Helped my morning along.

    I agree completely that an open interconnected web with our own URL in the center, matrixed through our world of friends and networks is the ideal.

    So, the practical marketer and market builder comments…sure you are right but you and everyone has many audiences and something to say. Aren't you bringing your thinking to your Twitter network, your FB network of friends and on and on.

    Cutting the cord from communications channels because philosophically they are within your belief structure is noble….but I question the goal…which is communicating and if your message has value (which it does) you need to bring it to your audiences until you tip the scales and they come to you.

  • http://www.victusspiritus.com/ Mark Essel

    Thank you Arnold, appreciate your well though perspective. I suspect
    that I have to push myself to creating more distributed alternatives.
    As long as I keep feeding another network, my own interests fade, my
    own passion to introduce more options withers.

    We'll see how long I can hold my breath :) . I worry the issue that
    troubles me is systemic to many aspects of the current social web.
    Even Disqus is a funnel and jump through someone elses hoops. But as
    long as I can opt out at any time (full data portability) I feel it's
    a fair exchange. I can't even find my tweets from 8 days ago, unless I
    knock on the library of congresses doors. Networks shouldn't act as
    owners and gatekeepers to collective data. They should take on the
    role of protectors but always enable full and simple portability.

  • http://www.victusspiritus.com/ Mark Essel

    Only for 7 days hehe, then I'll fade from search.

    Maybe there's an opportunity for kooks like me for a single click
    export from any central social network to my new distributed open
    source format/standard?

  • http://arnoldwaldstein.com awaldstein

    At my core Mark, I completely agree with you.

    Maybe the difference in our perspectives come from the simple fact that your ideas are part of your discovery process for the product your start-up is building. That is you are building (I think) something that will create a new way to navigate and use the nodes of the web. I can't wait to use this myself!

    I have a project that is about to start moving forward, but I'm mostly about communications channels…thinking and writing and helping folks realize their business goals on the social web. I want to bring those messages to folks where they are. That not only broadens my network but broadens my perspective.

    Am I off base with this?

  • http://www.victusspiritus.com/ Mark Essel

    Of course you're not off base. You are far more considerate of those
    that benefit from your expertise. I news to get my head around the
    ramifications of constraints on future communication channels. Have
    you considered the fact that your fans (myself included) may benefit
    from alternative formats more than we do from following you on say
    twitter? Even at my pruned 60 or so follow level, I miss opportunities
    to engage with content you share. There's too many folks trying to
    cram everything in to many 140 character updates. I admire the
    fluidity but I would appreciate the ability to code up my own
    extensions in a ways that others who use the same network can benefit
    from. The companies hold the keys to formats, not the community. At
    least in the most popular soc networks. I get the feeling I'm playing
    into an elaborate mouse trap when I push againt the boundaries, whenI
    rattle the cage. It's not all bad, these companies are hinting at
    what's possible if we embrace serendipity and collaborative
    communication.

    As to the project: it should mirror a wordpress approach to social web
    browsing/writing. We're purposefully doing our best to keep it lean.
    In order to test out some of the technology Tyler has used it in a
    ruby open source implementation. It can play well with identi.ca and
    buzz at the moment. If web finger catches on it'll work with much more
    without specialization to a service.

    Hoping I don't do a disservice to the front end design or game
    mechanics that'll promote tagging/connectivity between updates.

    My soapbox
    Http://www.victusspiritus.com/

  • http://arnoldwaldstein.com awaldstein

    I love this chatter…it sticks with me and inspires.

    Thanks and enjoy.

  • http://steamcatapult.com/ Dave Pinsen

    I saw Better than Ezra at Irving Plaza several years ago and they quoted a couple measures of B.O.C.'s Don't fear the Reaper in an extended bridge of Desperately Wanting. Worked perfectly.

  • lidicus

    That song was distinctly lacking in cowbell.

  • http://www.everyonelovestea.com Tyler from Everyone Loves Tea

    One (of many) of our tools is called RedRobin http://redrob.in it is a ruby implemenation of the ostatus protocol http://ostatus.org, it is also completely open source. http://github.com/tjgillies/robin be on the lookout for many other innovative idea from Victus

  • http://www.victusspiritus.com/ Mark Essel

    ;)