Dec 13

This is a continuation of a post I wrote in August about reader stats and attention, Ignore the Stats Connect with Your Authentic Audience. I firmly believe the real value in social media is in connecting with your authentic audience. A 1000 people read my blog last month, 9000 people didn’t like the font and left.

Some Shifts In View Since August

1) With the release of lists I was able to keep track of groups of people on Twitter while at the same time shrinking my follow list to under a hundred people. Hooray for empowering super human filters (or mortal portals, another shiny nickel Louis Gray!).

2) Not all stats are to be ignored. Google Analytics is every blogger’s or site host’s friend. There’s a Wordpress plugin, or you can copy a script to the footer of your page. An alternative analytics tool Clicky keeps track of real time visitor information.

How to Determine Actual Readers from Google Analytics

First off, if you’re serious about measuring how well a particular post resonates with readers, you have to know how many people took the time to read the article. I mentioned before that the “views” and “page view” stats are pretty meaningless by themselves, but are fine if you believe ignorance is bliss.

Self delusion doesn’t fill hungry bellies or minds.

While logged into your analytics site you want to pay careful attention to the visitor stats. The important measure is visitor duration or time on page. In Google Analytics this is under visitor stats, visitor loyalty, length of visit. You can and should add this to your dashboard (why Google Analytics defaults to views is beyond me). Its important to look past the average time onpage, because a few very interested readers (tail statistics) can have a significant effect on a small sample.

As an example for every 100 or so views, one reader will spend 20+ minutes or more (thanks) catching up on my blog posts. I’d say they’re really interested, or happened to go afk for breakfast while on my site. I’m happy with either result. If their afk eating I’ve helped satisfy their hunger for food, and if they’re entranced by my posts I’ve helped satisfy their curiousity.

Crowd Sourced Referral Readers Don’t Read

It was a startling realization, but all the amazing “views” I get from sites like HackerNews, Reddit, Digg or StumbleUpon are 80-90% meaningless. Not only do very few of them revisit my site, but the vast majority of folks that find my blog posts from social sites leave in under 10seconds. That’s an obvious signal to me that they aren’t even reading the first paragraph. How can anyone really judge the value of an article in under 10 seconds without reading any of it? The obvious answer, they can’t.

A couple of key lessons I take away from this:
1) Most online browsers don’t consume information like I do. I prefer to read an entire post or article. I dig into any reference links I’m unsure of to completely understand the message the writer thought was important enough to share. If the post doesn’t resonate with me I’m less likely to return to that site.

2) Maybe social media is really 90% hype? I wonder how many referral readers from Facebook, Twitter, or a news site actually read a post they open up. Dave Winer, one of the guys I’ve grown to trust in the blogosphere, mentioned something along these lines. He wrote that some folks see a title he shares, then proceed to blindly comment. That activity isn’t very meaningful, or respectful of Dave’s blog.

There’s still Hope in Social Sharing

Even if only ten (or one) out of a 100 viewers takes the time to read one of our posts there’s value in the exchange. What we need to do is develop better filters so that we can respect the attention of the other 90 who aren’t interested in our topic.

I thought about adding a simple true or false, or addition problem as a gate on the outside of my site the first time a visitor finds it.
1) It would serve as a quick signal, now those 10 second visitors can bounce in 1-2 seconds. I do care about their attention.
2) Only the really interested readers will stick around
3) Either way visitors will learn something about me and the type of blog I write. If you don’t feel like thinking, come back later.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • HackerNews
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

written by Mark Essel \\ tags: ,

  • A) I love the new look. It is so damn clean. So nice looking. OMG!!!


    B) You are right about the limited value of social networking. You need to see Mark Suster's post today about comments though and the value of disqus. It might equally be that the value is the glue between the people that do read.

    Either this means we now live in an echo chamber (we are all reading the same people's stuff) or that over time social networking tools act like flytrap glue. You have to be engaging to the 10% that will stay, rather than the rest.
  • Mango Orange i3theme, user controlled windows. I too love the theme. I wanted my virtual playground to be cozier, and user modable.

    I agree on the 10-15%, I'd like to pull in the folks on the fence too. Those 30 seconds guys and gals that are almost ready to commit to a read. We are reading much of the same material, but we're still a pretty massive Hidra. Incredibly diverse perspectives are more powerful at the social search of a problem space.
  • Important post Mark.

    Figuring out what data has meaning is the key to all analysis and you nailed most of it here.

    For me: Time on site, bounce and source are the most important and what I pay attention to.

    Question--using Google Analytics can i take this further and determine by source, time on site and bounce? That would be super helpful in understanding the value of my networks.
  • Both Clicky & Analytics do break things down by referral source so you can check your favorite metrics. Google Analytics is pretty impressive for understanding how long visitors from a given location stay on your site.

    I've been happily surprised by a few posts that people generally found worth reading.

    Never realized how important a theme was until
    learning that such a big percentage of browsers decide instantly (by the layout) whether to read a post.
  • Thnx and I'll run the numbers tonight.

    I believe what you say about a theme obviously as for me design is visualization of the brand. But while you or I may like our respective themes, we don't know, except through comments, whether the theme is driving people to stay or to leave. Unless of course you A/B it in some way.
  • Arnold I just got a golden nugget of a comment on HackerNews from Karl Bunday. It turns out only 16% of Internet users actually read pages, the rest scan for words of interest.
    Here are the references he was kind enough to share:
    1) How Users Read on the Web
    2) How Little Do Users Read?
    3) Eyetracking Research, I had seen this once but forgotten about it long ago.
  • There are a large numbers of reasons for this.

    Which are well outlined I see on looking at your links. I still think web designers have a long ways to go to make something look quality as well as read like quality. Most stuff is crap, especially if you look for a fluffy topic umm such as what is the meaning of a soulmate (don't make fun of me)
  • Thnx.

    I'll check this out.

    Of course you need to balance the abbreviation of style with the type of information and reader that you are trying to connect with.

    Oy! Everything is balance.
  • I'm pretty sure I'm writing for the readers, I don't think I can properly pass on my thoughts in a format that is compatible with the scanners. Luckily my fiance has agreed to help me, she just told me she's a web page scanner.
blog comments powered by Disqus
i3Theme sponsored by Top 10 Web Hosting, Hosting in Colombia and Bluehost