<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Thinking with Tim Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/10/02/design-thinking-with-tim-brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/10/02/design-thinking-with-tim-brown/</link>
	<description>a blog by Mark Essel on web technology, startups and design philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EMP Project Evolution Cycle</title>
		<link>http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/10/02/design-thinking-with-tim-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>EMP Project Evolution Cycle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victusspiritus.com/?p=1751#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>[...] that may be embedded in hardware defaults (product physical design), or open to user customization. Design Thinking by Tim Brown begins to explore the history and reality of user based customization of design [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that may be embedded in hardware defaults (product physical design), or open to user customization. Design Thinking by Tim Brown begins to explore the history and reality of user based customization of design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critiques In Tech &#124; Essays</title>
		<link>http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/10/02/design-thinking-with-tim-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Critiques In Tech &#124; Essays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victusspiritus.com/?p=1751#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>[...] out of Fred Wilson&#8217;s blog about the nature of sharing by one DL.  Another is the fact that Mark Essel recently posted about Tim Brown&#8217;s, of Ideo, speech from Ted.  A third impetus is my watching [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out of Fred Wilson&#8217;s blog about the nature of sharing by one DL.  Another is the fact that Mark Essel recently posted about Tim Brown&#8217;s, of Ideo, speech from Ted.  A third impetus is my watching [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Essel</title>
		<link>http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/10/02/design-thinking-with-tim-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Essel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victusspiritus.com/?p=1751#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>Incredibly well thought out quote. Added reading Walter Gropius to my email/tasks list, thanks for pointing me to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredibly well thought out quote. Added reading Walter Gropius to my email/tasks list, thanks for pointing me to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/10/02/design-thinking-with-tim-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victusspiritus.com/?p=1751#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s right about it not being about &lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt; design.  Difficult workspace to be in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m also slightly annoyed that the Bauhaus as a school of thought didn&#039;t come up.  You can&#039;t escape the idea of merging the spirit, the mind, and the body in a simple object without encountering the Bauhaus. It&#039;s an equally radical view, since Tom view could be seen as elitist in a totally different view:  why are a bunch of designers running around participating to take others ideas and working on them- or teaching others how to think.  Gropius is radical that design is physical craft skills- that there may be different kinds of design craft (nurse-craft) and innate intelligence for all these kinds of crafts for everyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;... Although we may achieve an awareness of the infinite we can give form to space only with finite means. We become aware of space through our undivided Ego, through the simultaneous activity of soul, mind and body. A like concentration of all our forces is necessary to give it form. Through his intuition, through his metaphysical powers, man discovers the immaterial space of inward vision and inspiration. This conception of space demands realization in the material world, a realization which is accomplished by the brain and the hands.&lt;br&gt;The brain conceives of mathematical space in terms of numbers and dimensions. . . . The hand masters matter through the crafts, and with the help of tools and machinery.&lt;br&gt;Conception and visualization are always simultaneous. Only the individual&#039;s capacity to feel, to know and to execute varies in degree and in speed. True creative work can be done only by the man&lt;br&gt;whose knowledge and mastery of the physical laws of statics, dynamics, optics, acoustics equip him to give life and shape to his inner vision. In a work of art the laws of the physical world, the intellectual&lt;br&gt;world and the world of the spirit function and are expressed simultaneously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;_Walter Gropius&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Never avoid him, he rewrote the book on design during one of the most radical periods of time, the Weinmar)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#39;s right about it not being about <em>a</em> design.  Difficult workspace to be in.</p>
<p>I&#39;m also slightly annoyed that the Bauhaus as a school of thought didn&#39;t come up.  You can&#39;t escape the idea of merging the spirit, the mind, and the body in a simple object without encountering the Bauhaus. It&#39;s an equally radical view, since Tom view could be seen as elitist in a totally different view:  why are a bunch of designers running around participating to take others ideas and working on them- or teaching others how to think.  Gropius is radical that design is physical craft skills- that there may be different kinds of design craft (nurse-craft) and innate intelligence for all these kinds of crafts for everyone.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8230; Although we may achieve an awareness of the infinite we can give form to space only with finite means. We become aware of space through our undivided Ego, through the simultaneous activity of soul, mind and body. A like concentration of all our forces is necessary to give it form. Through his intuition, through his metaphysical powers, man discovers the immaterial space of inward vision and inspiration. This conception of space demands realization in the material world, a realization which is accomplished by the brain and the hands.<br />The brain conceives of mathematical space in terms of numbers and dimensions. . . . The hand masters matter through the crafts, and with the help of tools and machinery.<br />Conception and visualization are always simultaneous. Only the individual&#39;s capacity to feel, to know and to execute varies in degree and in speed. True creative work can be done only by the man<br />whose knowledge and mastery of the physical laws of statics, dynamics, optics, acoustics equip him to give life and shape to his inner vision. In a work of art the laws of the physical world, the intellectual<br />world and the world of the spirit function and are expressed simultaneously.</p></blockquote>
<p>_Walter Gropius</p>
<p>(Never avoid him, he rewrote the book on design during one of the most radical periods of time, the Weinmar)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Essel</title>
		<link>http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/10/02/design-thinking-with-tim-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Essel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victusspiritus.com/?p=1751#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Incredibly well thought out quote. Added reading Walter Gropius to my email/tasks list, thanks for pointing me to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredibly well thought out quote. Added reading Walter Gropius to my email/tasks list, thanks for pointing me to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanaC</title>
		<link>http://www.victusspiritus.com/2009/10/02/design-thinking-with-tim-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victusspiritus.com/?p=1751#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s right about it not being about &lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt; design.  Difficult workspace to be in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m also slightly annoyed that the Bauhaus as a school of thought didn&#039;t come up.  You can&#039;t escape the idea of merging the spirit, the mind, and the body in a simple object without encountering the Bauhaus. It&#039;s an equally radical view, since Tom view could be seen as elitist in a totally different view:  why are a bunch of designers running around participating to take others ideas and working on them- or teaching others how to think.  Gropius is radical that design is physical craft skills- that there may be different kinds of design craft (nurse-craft) and innate intelligence for all these kinds of crafts for everyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;... Although we may achieve an awareness of the infinite we can give form to space only with finite means. We become aware of space through our undivided Ego, through the simultaneous activity of soul, mind and body. A like concentration of all our forces is necessary to give it form. Through his intuition, through his metaphysical powers, man discovers the immaterial space of inward vision and inspiration. This conception of space demands realization in the material world, a realization which is accomplished by the brain and the hands.&lt;br&gt;The brain conceives of mathematical space in terms of numbers and dimensions. . . . The hand masters matter through the crafts, and with the help of tools and machinery.&lt;br&gt;Conception and visualization are always simultaneous. Only the individual&#039;s capacity to feel, to know and to execute varies in degree and in speed. True creative work can be done only by the man&lt;br&gt;whose knowledge and mastery of the physical laws of statics, dynamics, optics, acoustics equip him to give life and shape to his inner vision. In a work of art the laws of the physical world, the intellectual&lt;br&gt;world and the world of the spirit function and are expressed simultaneously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;_Walter Gropius&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Never avoid him, he rewrote the book on design during one of the most radical periods of time, the Weinmar)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#39;s right about it not being about <em>a</em> design.  Difficult workspace to be in.</p>
<p>I&#39;m also slightly annoyed that the Bauhaus as a school of thought didn&#39;t come up.  You can&#39;t escape the idea of merging the spirit, the mind, and the body in a simple object without encountering the Bauhaus. It&#39;s an equally radical view, since Tom view could be seen as elitist in a totally different view:  why are a bunch of designers running around participating to take others ideas and working on them- or teaching others how to think.  Gropius is radical that design is physical craft skills- that there may be different kinds of design craft (nurse-craft) and innate intelligence for all these kinds of crafts for everyone.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8230; Although we may achieve an awareness of the infinite we can give form to space only with finite means. We become aware of space through our undivided Ego, through the simultaneous activity of soul, mind and body. A like concentration of all our forces is necessary to give it form. Through his intuition, through his metaphysical powers, man discovers the immaterial space of inward vision and inspiration. This conception of space demands realization in the material world, a realization which is accomplished by the brain and the hands.<br />The brain conceives of mathematical space in terms of numbers and dimensions. . . . The hand masters matter through the crafts, and with the help of tools and machinery.<br />Conception and visualization are always simultaneous. Only the individual&#39;s capacity to feel, to know and to execute varies in degree and in speed. True creative work can be done only by the man<br />whose knowledge and mastery of the physical laws of statics, dynamics, optics, acoustics equip him to give life and shape to his inner vision. In a work of art the laws of the physical world, the intellectual<br />world and the world of the spirit function and are expressed simultaneously.</p></blockquote>
<p>_Walter Gropius</p>
<p>(Never avoid him, he rewrote the book on design during one of the most radical periods of time, the Weinmar)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

